(no subject)
Mar. 9th, 2010 08:19 pmSo I wrote about the Missing Girl Babies a while back. It's here if your memory isn't as long as mine. (I had to utilize my happy little lj search engine: grep -H "baby girls" /home/jessica/Desktop/ljdump-1.5/which-chick/* but other that that it was no trouble. I knew I'd talked about it.) Today my copy of The Economist has a cover story on, yeah, the Missing Girl Babies. You can see the cover here but can't read the article b/c they don't allow for that. It's a lot like the lj post I made, though, so you're not missing much.
Stuff like this just makes me wonder how much 'news' is really all that new. Also, reading my lj means you are six years more informed on the missing baby girls thing than readers of The Economist. I also regularly scoop the NYT. :)
( In other news... )
Stuff like this just makes me wonder how much 'news' is really all that new. Also, reading my lj means you are six years more informed on the missing baby girls thing than readers of The Economist. I also regularly scoop the NYT. :)