![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Mar. 6th, 2009 11:00 pmWow, I've been slacking on the update front. My bad.
Current item of interest the first: CGI porn. I'm not sure what the point is. Well, actually, I probably do understand the point, but still, it's odd to see it with an English-language soundtrack. (They're making one. With, I should point out, gay pirates. I find this absolutely hysterical.) I'm reasonably certain that CGI porn is guiltless. It's not exploiting anyone, as long as doing porn dialogue and fx in a sound studio is non-exploitative and I can't see how it really would be. After all, the people doing the dialogue and fx are *actors*. (Probably.) I'm not sure that doing the dialogue and fx for CGI porn is any more demeaning than pretending to be a teapot (Angela Lansbury) or a car (Paul Newman) or a mentally-challenged fish (Ellen DeGeneres) or a donkey (Eddie Murphy).
( The remainder of this post suggests improvements to Weis's self-checkout. )
Current item of interest the first: CGI porn. I'm not sure what the point is. Well, actually, I probably do understand the point, but still, it's odd to see it with an English-language soundtrack. (They're making one. With, I should point out, gay pirates. I find this absolutely hysterical.) I'm reasonably certain that CGI porn is guiltless. It's not exploiting anyone, as long as doing porn dialogue and fx in a sound studio is non-exploitative and I can't see how it really would be. After all, the people doing the dialogue and fx are *actors*. (Probably.) I'm not sure that doing the dialogue and fx for CGI porn is any more demeaning than pretending to be a teapot (Angela Lansbury) or a car (Paul Newman) or a mentally-challenged fish (Ellen DeGeneres) or a donkey (Eddie Murphy).
( The remainder of this post suggests improvements to Weis's self-checkout. )
