(no subject)
Apr. 13th, 2007 09:39 pmThe camera came today.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't have a vibrate feature, but it apparently has every other damn feature on the planet.
Sample images: (I got it after lunch today. This was just "Hey, look, I took a picture!" dicking around. Clearly, I need more work on framing, on telling how much light the lens really needs, on what the zoom can and cannot do for me... but there will be time to learn that. This was just starter stuff. I have a new camera. I can take pictures with it. Yay!
Heather's daughter, Tess

Tess, again. (I do not have many relatives who tolerate having their pictures taken. Tess is the only one locally.)

My side of the mountain.

The other side of the mountain.

The faucet in my bathtub.

Half-and-half poured into a jar full of water. I want to do a better job than this, with less distortion (where the jar bends) and better lighting (not a big blob on the glass where the flash hit) but this was proof of concept for me and I am happy with it for that.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't have a vibrate feature, but it apparently has every other damn feature on the planet.
Sample images: (I got it after lunch today. This was just "Hey, look, I took a picture!" dicking around. Clearly, I need more work on framing, on telling how much light the lens really needs, on what the zoom can and cannot do for me... but there will be time to learn that. This was just starter stuff. I have a new camera. I can take pictures with it. Yay!
Heather's daughter, Tess

Tess, again. (I do not have many relatives who tolerate having their pictures taken. Tess is the only one locally.)

My side of the mountain.

The other side of the mountain.

The faucet in my bathtub.

Half-and-half poured into a jar full of water. I want to do a better job than this, with less distortion (where the jar bends) and better lighting (not a big blob on the glass where the flash hit) but this was proof of concept for me and I am happy with it for that.

no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 01:25 am (UTC)Hooray!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 01:57 am (UTC)(If I've seen the Tess before, I plead "They change so fast!")
About the moving liquids: Dayum! Your camera is sooooooo hot. Mine would not be able to get the whole picture saved before the scene changed, I think.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 02:25 am (UTC)To make it better...
1. Flat glass instead of curved. I'm thinking maybe a small goldfish-sized tank (the kind with two curved sides and two flat sides). WalMart has those.
2. Better background than my cutting board stood on end. Cutting board is honestly non-uniform color anymore and it's marked up. I'm thinking maybe construction paper, stuck to the back of the fishbowl. (I am totally all about the high tech, here.)
3. Better lighting. I needed flash in my kitchen at nine in the evening and what I *had* was on-camera flash. I think I can do better.
4. An assistant to pour when I say to pour. It's no fun to have to pour with one hand and take the picture with the other hand. (Number of people I know who could be coerced into participating in this kind of foolishness: none.)
5. More and different substances. (Cream experiments were cut short because I need that for my coffee. Milk is not anywhere near as satisfactory because it's thinner and mixes too readily.) Ink-in-water? I'd use a white background for that, I think. There, I could do from-the-top shots or maybe from-the-bottom shots. I bet that would be interesting. Cream into tea. That's a gorgeous effect. Cream into other colored liquids (beet juice?) to see. I bet the cream would lighten up the colors and make things look like shades of the color...
6. Try taking pictures of smoke from those dumb-ass incense sticks. (Similar interest for me, techniques might map. Also a lighting problem.) I like when the smoke makes little scrolls in still air. Note to self: buy dumb-ass incense sticks or acquire the next batch that pot-smoking tenants leave behind.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 06:02 am (UTC)re camera in general: I'm totally jealous. My photo teacher told me I should get a "cheap digital SLR." I don't think such a thing exists, but the fact that he told me to do so made me REALLY want a digital SLR.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 10:12 am (UTC)Price check (amazon.com)
Nikon D40 w/ 18-55 II kit lens: $540
Canon Digital Rebel XT w/ EF-S 18-55mm kit lens: $606
I don't know that you can do much less than that unless you're willing to buy used. All of the pictures (above) were taken with the Nikon 18-55 kit lens (which I bought used for a hundred bucks, came with both lens caps, and clear tiffen UV filter).
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 06:13 pm (UTC)I'm not averse to buying used in theory, but there doens't seem to be a good way to go about it and not depend on the luck of the draw, as it were. Also my point and shoot is 10 MP-- so I don't want to go backwards in terms of image quality too much.
Of course, if I wanted to I could just buy the most expensive thing I could find, since I have $3500 of otherwise unusable scholarship money, but I'm not sure I want to, all the same. I should probably just suck it up and do it! I just hate spending money!
By the way, you may find it interesting/hilarious that he wants me to do this so I can take digital pinhole pictures. (I can't complain. It sounds like fun. Just, usually, my "sounds like fun" whims cost $10, not $1000.)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 03:52 am (UTC)very nice. i've been fighting the urge to get a shiny camera - i have no time to spend with it, and if i do, i have to sacrifice something i need to do more.
:(
i still miss the smell of darkroom chemistry...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 03:53 am (UTC)oh, also, try the half-and-half trick with heavy whipping cream...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 12:33 pm (UTC)I am glad that it finally came.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-15 08:05 pm (UTC)hillmountain? That's a pretty impressive view.no subject
Date: 2007-04-15 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 08:19 pm (UTC)I never before quite understood the big differences between cheap cameras and expensive ones. I do now, these pics explain it all. Very impressive!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-18 01:17 am (UTC)Tess is a cutie.
Mountain (both sides) looks like a pretty nice place to live.
Water falling and cream in water are pretty cool...definite potential there!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-30 10:49 pm (UTC)In particular, the bits about pretty mountains and the cream-in-water - nice!
I've flickr-added you, so as to see more of your experiments :)