(no subject)

I'm sort of torn on reading this. My first, knee-jerk reaction is that it's dumb as shit to try to convince people to not have teh hawt s3x0r, particularly once they're not teenagers anymore. My second, slightly less knee-jerk reaction is that maybe the state has some vested interest in seeing to it that children are brought forth into reasonably financially-stable households with the resources to rear them. (This doesn't necessarily mean married households but it does set the bar as high as the be not a burden upon the state line.)

( So... if the state does have an interest, what should it do? )